International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature

Taxonomic Group

Lepidoptera

Found 39 results

Case 3767: Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793 (currently Parnassius phoebus; Insecta, Lepidoptera): proposed conservation of prevailing usage of the specific name and that of Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne) by the designation of a neotype

Vladimir A. Lukhtanov, Jonathan P. Pelham, Adam M. Cotton, John V. Calhoun, “Case 3767: Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793 (currently Parnassius phoebus; Insecta, Lepidoptera): proposed conservation of prevailing usage of the specific name and that of Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne) by the designation of a neotype”, Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, vol. 76, pp. , 2019.

The purpose of this application under Article 75.6 of the Code is to conserve the specific names of the European ‘Small Apollo’ butterfly Parnassius phoebus (Fabricius, 1793) and the Altai ‘Apollo’ butterfly Parnassius ariadne (Lederer, 1853) in their current usage. Hanus & Theye (2010) discovered....

Read more Google Scholar BibTex XML RIS

Comment 3767-1: Opposition to the conservation of prevailing usage of the specific name Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793 and that of Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne) by the designation of a neotype

Stanislav K. Korb, “Comment 3767-1: Opposition to the conservation of prevailing usage of the specific name Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793 and that of Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne) by the designation of a neotype”, Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, vol. 77, pp. , 2020.

Read more Google Scholar BibTex XML RIS

Comment 3767-2: Support for the conservation of prevailing usage of the specific name Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793 (currently Parnassius phoebus), and that of Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne), by designation of a neotype

Richard I. Vane-Wright, “Comment 3767-2: Support for the conservation of prevailing usage of the specific name Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793 (currently Parnassius phoebus), and that of Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne), by designation of a neotype”, Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, vol. 78, pp. , 2021.

Read more Google Scholar BibTex XML RIS

Comment 3767-3: More support for the conservation of prevailing usage of the specific name Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793 (currently Parnassius phoebus), and that of Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne), by designation of a neotype

Zsolt Bálint, “Comment 3767-3: More support for the conservation of prevailing usage of the specific name Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793 (currently Parnassius phoebus), and that of Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne), by designation of a neotype”, Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, vol. 78, pp. , 2021.

Read more Google Scholar BibTex XML RIS

Comment 3767-4: Support for the proposed conservation of the specific name Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793
(currently Parnassius phoebus) because of prevailing usage

Oleg E. Kosterin, “Comment 3767-4: Support for the proposed conservation of the specific name Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793
(currently Parnassius phoebus) because of prevailing usage”
, Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, vol. 78, pp. 133-134, 2021.

Read more Google Scholar BibTex XML RIS

Comment 3767-5: Support for the conservation of prevailing usage of the specific name Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793
(currently Parnassius phoebus), and that of Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne), by designation of a neotype

Martin Wiemers, “Comment 3767-5: Support for the conservation of prevailing usage of the specific name Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793
(currently Parnassius phoebus), and that of Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne), by designation of a neotype”
, Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, vol. 78, pp. 135-136, 2021.

Read more Google Scholar BibTex XML RIS

Case 3814: Proposed conservation of usage of the name Mylothris agathina Cramer, 1779 (Lepidoptera, Pieridae)

Haydon Warren-Gash, “Case 3814: Proposed conservation of usage of the name Mylothris agathina Cramer, 1779 (Lepidoptera, Pieridae)”, Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature,

Noticed in BZN 76 (20 Dec 2019): 166. Case closure notice published in BZN 77: 156.

Read more Google Scholar BibTex XML RIS

Case 3819: Euchromiini Léger et al., 2019 (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Crambidae) and Euchromiinae Butler, 1876 (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Erebidae): proposed resolution of homonymy by emending the former to Euchromiusini.

Bernard Landry, Théo Léger, Matthias Nuss, “Case 3819: Euchromiini Léger et al., 2019 (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Crambidae) and Euchromiinae Butler, 1876 (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Erebidae): proposed resolution of homonymy by emending the former to Euchromiusini.”, Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, vol. 77, pp. , 2020.

The purpose of this application, under Article 55.3.1 of the Code, is to remove the homonymy of Euchromiini Léger, Landry & Nuss, 2019 (Lepidoptera, Crambidae) (type genus Euchromius Guenée, 1845) with Euchromiinae Butler, 1876 (Lepidoptera, Erebidae) (type genus Euchromia Hübner, 1816) by emending the former....

Read more Google Scholar BibTex XML RIS

Case 3841: Epigraphiidae Guenée, 1845 (Lepidoptera, Gelechioidea): proposed suppression to conserve the widely used family group name Depressariidae Meyrick, 1883. 

Nieukerken, Erik J. van , Ole Karsholt, Richard L. Brown, Maria Heikkilä, Peter Huemer, Lauri Kaila, Jean-François Landry, Houhun Li, Margarita G. Ponomarenko, Sergey Sinev, “Case 3841: Epigraphiidae Guenée, 1845 (Lepidoptera, Gelechioidea): proposed suppression to conserve the widely used family group name Depressariidae Meyrick, 1883. ”, Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature,

Noticed in BZN 78 (30 Apr 2021): 2.

Read more Google Scholar BibTex XML RIS