Found 39 results
Vladimir A. Lukhtanov, Jonathan P. Pelham, Adam M. Cotton, John V. Calhoun, “Case 3767: Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793 (currently Parnassius phoebus; Insecta, Lepidoptera): proposed conservation of prevailing usage of the specific name and that of Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne) by the designation of a neotype”, Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, vol. 76, pp. , 2019.
The purpose of this application under Article 75.6 of the Code is to conserve the specific names of the European ‘Small Apollo’ butterfly Parnassius phoebus (Fabricius, 1793) and the Altai ‘Apollo’ butterfly Parnassius ariadne (Lederer, 1853) in their current usage. Hanus & Theye (2010) discovered....
Stanislav K. Korb, “Comment 3767-1: Opposition to the conservation of prevailing usage of the specific name Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793 and that of Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne) by the designation of a neotype”, Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, vol. 77, pp. , 2020.
Richard I. Vane-Wright, “Comment 3767-2: Support for the conservation of prevailing usage of the specific name Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793 (currently Parnassius phoebus), and that of Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne), by designation of a neotype”, Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, vol. 78, pp. , 2021.
Zsolt Bálint, “Comment 3767-3: More support for the conservation of prevailing usage of the specific name Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793 (currently Parnassius phoebus), and that of Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne), by designation of a neotype”, Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, vol. 78, pp. , 2021.
Oleg E. Kosterin,
“Comment 3767-4: Support for the proposed conservation of the specific name Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793
(currently Parnassius phoebus) because of prevailing usage”,
Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature,
vol. 78,
pp. 133-134,
2021.
Martin Wiemers,
“Comment 3767-5: Support for the conservation of prevailing usage of the specific name Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793
(currently Parnassius phoebus), and that of Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne), by designation of a neotype”,
Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature,
vol. 78,
pp. 135-136,
2021.
Haydon Warren-Gash, “Case 3814: Proposed conservation of usage of the name Mylothris agathina Cramer, 1779 (Lepidoptera, Pieridae)”, Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature,
Noticed in BZN 76 (20 Dec 2019): 166. Case closure notice published in BZN 77: 156.
Bernard Landry, Théo Léger, Matthias Nuss, “Case 3819: Euchromiini Léger et al., 2019 (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Crambidae) and Euchromiinae Butler, 1876 (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Erebidae): proposed resolution of homonymy by emending the former to Euchromiusini.”, Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, vol. 77, pp. , 2020.
The purpose of this application, under Article 55.3.1 of the Code, is to remove the homonymy of Euchromiini Léger, Landry & Nuss, 2019 (Lepidoptera, Crambidae) (type genus Euchromius Guenée, 1845) with Euchromiinae Butler, 1876 (Lepidoptera, Erebidae) (type genus Euchromia Hübner, 1816) by emending the former....
Nieukerken, Erik J. van , Ole Karsholt, Richard L. Brown, Maria Heikkilä, Peter Huemer, Lauri Kaila, Jean-François Landry, Houhun Li, Margarita G. Ponomarenko, Sergey Sinev, “Case 3841: Epigraphiidae Guenée, 1845 (Lepidoptera, Gelechioidea): proposed suppression to conserve the widely used family group name Depressariidae Meyrick, 1883. ”, Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature,
Noticed in BZN 78 (30 Apr 2021): 2.
ICZN is supported by the Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, National University of Singapore (Company Registration No. 200604346E).
ICZN is an Associate Participant to the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) & a Scientific Member of the International Union of Biological Science (IUBS).
Correspondence to the ICZN should be directed to the Secretary (iczn@nus.edu.sg / +65 6518 8364).