International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature

Case 3767

Overview

Case 3767: Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793 (currently Parnassius phoebus; Insecta, Lepidoptera): proposed conservation of prevailing usage of the specific name and that of Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne) by the designation of a neotype

Publication Type:Journal Article
Year of Publication:2019
Authors: Lukhtanov, V. A., Pelham, J. P., Cotton, A. M., Calhoun, J. V.
Journal:Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature
Volume:76
Issue:
Start Page:14
Pagination:
Date Published:04/2019
Type of Article:Case
Keywords: Nomenclature, taxonomy, PAPILIONIDAE, PARNASSIINAE, Parnassius, P. phoebus, P. ariadne, P. corybas, European 'Small Apollo' butterfly, Holarctic, Altai 'Apollo'butterfly
Abstract:

The purpose of this application under Article 75.6 of the Code is to conserve the specific names of the European ‘Small Apollo’ butterfly Parnassius phoebus (Fabricius, 1793) and the Altai ‘Apollo’ butterfly Parnassius ariadne (Lederer, 1853) in their current usage. Hanus & Theye (2010) discovered that the traditional concept of the name P. phoebus was a misidentification and published actions contrary to Art. 75.6. We herein request that the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature use its plenary power to set aside all previous type fixations for the nominal species Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793, and to designate a neotype representative of the current usage of P. phoebus.

Full Text:

http://dx.doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v76.a007 (Case)

Case:
Case 3767

Volume/Issue:
76

Taxonomic Group(s):
Insecta, Lepidoptera

Google Scholar BibTex XML RIS

Comments

Comment 3767-1: Opposition to the conservation of prevailing usage of the specific name Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793 and that of Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne) by the designation of a neotype
Publication Type:Journal Article
Year of Publication:2020
Authors: Korb, S. K.
Journal:Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature
Volume:77
Issue:
Start Page:86
Pagination:
Date Published:07/2020
Type of Article:Comment
Keywords:
Full Text:

http://dx.doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v77.a028

Comment:
Comment 3767-1

Volume/Issue:
77

Taxonomic Group(s):

Google Scholar BibTex XML RIS

Comment 3767-2: Support for the conservation of prevailing usage of the specific name Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793 (currently Parnassius phoebus), and that of Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne), by designation of a neotype
Publication Type:Journal Article
Year of Publication:2021
Authors: Vane-Wright, R. I.
Journal:Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature
Volume:78
Issue:
Start Page:36
Pagination:
Date Published:04/2021
Type of Article:Comment
Keywords:
Full Text:

http://dx.doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v78.a010

Comment:
Comment 3767-2

Volume/Issue:
78

Taxonomic Group(s):

Google Scholar BibTex XML RIS

Comment 3767-3: More support for the conservation of prevailing usage of the specific name Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793 (currently Parnassius phoebus), and that of Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne), by designation of a neotype
Publication Type:Journal Article
Year of Publication:2021
Authors: Bálint, Z.
Journal:Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature
Volume:78
Issue:
Start Page:38
Pagination:
Date Published:04/2021
Type of Article:Comment
Keywords:
Full Text:

http://dx.doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v78.a011

Comment:
Comment 3767-3

Volume/Issue:
78

Taxonomic Group(s):

Google Scholar BibTex XML RIS

Comment 3767-4: Support for the proposed conservation of the specific name Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793
(currently Parnassius phoebus) because of prevailing usage
Publication Type:Journal Article
Year of Publication:2021
Authors: Kosterin, O. E.
Journal:Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature
Volume:78
Issue:
Start Page:133
Pagination:133-134
Date Published:08/2021
Type of Article:Comment
Keywords:
Full Text:

http://dx.doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v78.a029

Comment:
Comment 3767-4

Volume/Issue:
78

Taxonomic Group(s):

Google Scholar BibTex XML RIS

Comment 3767-5: Support for the conservation of prevailing usage of the specific name Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793
(currently Parnassius phoebus), and that of Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne), by designation of a neotype
Publication Type:Journal Article
Year of Publication:2021
Authors: Wiemers, M.
Journal:Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature
Volume:78
Issue:
Start Page:135
Pagination:135-136
Date Published:08/2021
Type of Article:Comment
Keywords:
Full Text:

http://dx.doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v78.a030

Comment:
Comment 3767-5

Volume/Issue:
78

Taxonomic Group(s):

Google Scholar BibTex XML RIS

Status of Case:
Open Cases


For further information, please contact us.