Aves
Subscribe to e-mail notifications about Aves.
You may also make a donation by using our donation forms
Subscribe to e-mail notifications about Aves.
I write to support Bock & Bühler’s proposal to set aside the single feather holotype of Archaeopteryx lithographica in the Berlin and München Museums and to conserve the usage of Archaeopteryx lithographica von
Meyer, 1861 (Aves) by designation of a neotype, BMNH 37001 in the
Natural History Museum, London. The major reasons are as follows:
Firstly, hundreds of feathered dinosaurs have been found dating from
the late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous of northeastern China in the last
We support Bock & Bühler’s proposal to set aside the holotype specimen of Archaeopteryx lithographica von
Meyer, 1861 and to conserve this name by designating specimen BMNH
37001 in the Natural History Museum (the ‘London specimen’) as the
neotype. We echo the comments in this regard made by Barrett &
Milner (BZN 64: 261–262) and add our opinion that,
while a name is a useful tool, where usage is extensive, common sense
is more important than hermetic bureaucracy. Vertebrate
I agree with the objective of the applicants and the commentators (Bock & Bühler (BZN 63(3): 182–184) and Barrett & Milner (BZN 63(4): 261–262) to conserve the name Archaeopteryx lithographica in
its accustomed sense, i.e. as typified by the ‘London specimen’ (BMNH
37001) for all the reasons stated by these authors. However,
insufficient consideration has been given to the questions 1) in which